This topic contains 1 reply, has 2 voices, and was last updated by Nick Dranias 11 years, 4 months ago.
-
Mark Levin's Liberty Amendments
Started by Reese Swincher
I was wondering what your thoughts were on Mark Levin’s proposed Liberty Amendments?
For those not familiar:
1) Term Limits: He proposes limiting service in both the House and Senate to 12 years. Yes, we’ve heard all the arguments about elections being the best limit. But the past 100 year has proven that to be false. As someone who works day and night to throw the bums out, I can tell you that is nearly impossible to throw them out with the amount of money they raise – precisely for their abuses of power. Levin also proves that limiting time in office was a highly regarded proposal during the Constitutional Congress.
2) Repealing the 17th Amendment: Levin proposes repealing the 17th amendment and vesting state legislators with the power to elect senators so that the power of states is not diluted, as originally feared by the framers of the Constitution.
3) Restoring the Judiciary to its proper role: The Judiciary was never meant to be an all-powerful institution in which five men in robes have the final say over every major policy battle in the country. In order to end judicial tyranny, Levin proposes limiting service to one 12-year term, and granting both Congress and the state legislatures the authority to overturn court decisions with the vote of three-fifths of both houses of Congress or state legislative bodies.
4) Limiting Taxation and Spending: Levin proposes a balanced budget amendment, limiting spending to 17.5% of GDP and requiring a three-fifths vote to raise the debt ceiling. He also proposes limiting the power to tax to 15% of an individual’s income, prohibiting other forms of taxation, and placing the deadline to file one’s taxes one day before the next federal election.
5) Limiting bureaucracy: He proposes an amendment to limit and sunset federal regulations and subject the existence of all federal departments to stand-alone reauthorization bills every three years.
6) Defining the Commerce Clause: Levin writes an amendment that, while technically unnecessary, is practically an imperative to restoring the original intent of the Commerce Clause. The amendment would make it clear that the commerce clause grants not power to actively regulate and control activity; rather to prevent states from impeding commerce among other states, as Madison originally intended.
7) Limiting Federal power to take private property
8) Allowing State Legislature to Amend the Constitution: Although the Framers intentionally made it difficult to amend the Constitution, they did so to preserve the Republic they created. However, the progressives have illegally altered our Republic through a silent and gradual coup without using the amendment process. If we are going to successfully push the aforementioned amendments, we will need an easier mechanism to force them through. The proposed amendment allows states to bypass Congress and propose an amendment with support of just two-thirds of the states (instead of three-fourths) and without convening a convention.
9) State Authority to Override Congress: A proposed amendment to allow states to override federal statutes by majority vote in two-thirds of state legislatures. The last two proposals are rooted in the idea that the states only agreed to the Constitution on condition that their power would not be diluted and that all federal power is derived from the states.
10) Protecting the Vote: A proposal to require photo ID for all federal elections and limit early voting.
The forum ‘Discussion with Nick Dranias of the Goldwater Institute’ is closed to new topics and replies.
1RepliesNick Dranias, 11 years ago
Welcome to the party, Mark Levin! The Goldwater Institute (through yours truly) commissioned Rob Natelson’s seminal three part policy report urging the states to use their power under Article V to originate constitutional amendments nearly 3 years ago. Since then, I’ve been battling for various Article V initiatives in over 20 states. Our most recent effort is Compact for America, which uses an agreement among the states to determine in advance all aspects of the Article V convention process, to quickly and safely advance a powerful balanced budget amendment. I call it Article V 2.0. Read more about it here: http://www.goldwaterinstitute.org/articlev
All of Mark Levin’s proposed amendments are great policy ideas that I fully support. The only caveat I have is the fact that you need 38 states to ratify them. And some of the proposed amendments are going to have a very hard, if not impossible, time getting more than 25 behind them.
But hey, nobody said changing the world is easy. Go for it!
The forum ‘Discussion with Nick Dranias of the Goldwater Institute’ is closed to new topics and replies.