This topic contains 4 replies, has 4 voices, and was last updated by Vicki Call Brooks 11 years, 5 months ago.
-
Obamacare: 100 Unintended Consequences
Started by Margaret Cardwell
Please consider the following article on the impact Obamacare is having around the nation:
http://nationalreview.com/article/359861/100-unintended-consequences-obamacare-andrew-johnson
Thoughts? Suggestions?
Margo Cardwell
Policy Analyst
Texans for Greg AbbottYou will need to login to join the discussion.4RepliesAngela Harenza, 12 years ago
If the State of Texas comes up with its own health care plan that meets and exceeds coverage under ObamaCare… can all residents of the state be rendered exempt from the federally mandated program by instead being enrolled in the state’s program?
My thinking is… while I disagree with the concept of forcing citizens to purchase anything… it seems to me if Texas puts her mind to it we can almost certainly come up with a plan that is tremendously better than the hobbled together monstrosity that Washington is shoving down our throats.
I believe the state can get hospitals, clinics, doctors and health insurance carriers to willingly put their heads together in a way that benefits their bottom line, citizen’s health and everyone’s pocketbook.
Surely someone like Mitt Romney and others with some experience in what NOT to do would be available to us. In the short-term whatever funding gap might exist could possibly be met with our slush fund, the state’s lottery or even corporate contributions.
MC Lambeth, 12 years ago
Ms. Harenza, thanks for your input!
What are your thoughts on state control vs. federal control of state exchanges? How do you feel about allowing insurance carriers to sell across state lines?
MC Lambeth
Policy Analyst, Texans for Greg AbbottAngela Harenza, 12 years ago
Unfortunately I don’t believe the existing law under Obama’s Affordable Care Act actually would cede any real control of the exchange to the state. So if the question is state vs federal control of exchanges in their present form I’d prefer the state let the entire fiasco reside with the federal government. As it stands now the states, in my opinion, would be in control “in name only” with a cobbled together set of rules looking for someone to blame.
IF, however, the state of Texas is able to put together our own STATE affordable health care plan… I would want the state and only the state to have any say in how it is administered. Responsibility can’t be delegated… therefore… why put any other fingers in the authority pie.
Vicki Call Brooks, 11 years ago
There should be no state controlled healthcare. The government, even in the State of Texas, should stay away from being tempted into socialized medicine. Leave healthcare to the private sector. Allow consumers to buy across state lines and allow their company-provided healthcare to follow them from job to job. Only legal citizens can and should be on medicaid if they are between jobs. IF they are illegal, they shouldn’t be here anyway and I am sorry but should not have ANY rights that are afforded American citizens. They will leave the State of Texas if they know we actually enforce the laws already on the books. Offer a one way trip to either California or back across the border. Time to be honest about this.
As far as obamacare, we know this is unconstitutional and we need to keep clear of this in the State of Texas.