Home We the People Constitutional Rights Individual Liberty and Personal Freedom Allow voters the option to repeal red light camera ordinances

Allow voters the option to repeal red light camera ordinances

This topic contains 5 replies, has 6 voices, and was last updated by  Riley Litchfield 9 years, 5 months ago.

  • Allow voters the option to repeal red light camera ordinances

    Started by Greg Abbott

    Allow voters in counties and municipalities the option to repeal red light camera ordinances and operations by voter-initiated referendum.

    Currently, Chapter 707 of the Texas Transportation Code authorizes counties and municipalities to set up “red light” cameras at intersections. While popular with government officials because of significant increases in revenue, Texas has exhibited increasing local opposition to red light cameras. College Station repealed its red light camera law in 2009 after residents signed a petition to place the referendum on the ballot. Houston also repealed its red light camera ordinance in 2011 in a 14-1 vote of the city council. Baytown, Dayton, and League City have also voted to repeal their red light camera ordinances.

    Not every city has been successful in its efforts to remove its red light cameras. Earlier in 2013, citizens of Sugar Land gathered more than 3,000 signatures to put the issue on an upcoming ballot. The city council, however, threw out their petition on a technicality.

    The Legislature should pass a law amending Chapter 707 of the Transportation Code to include a provision allowing residents of counties and municipalities an option to repeal city government installation and operation of red light cameras. Currently, many local governments provide a means of petitioning for laws and presenting referendum votes. College Station, for instance, provides in Article 10 of its city charter a method of proposing changes to local code. If a petition is joined by at least 25 percent of the electorate–as measured by voters in the last municipal election–and is presented to the city council, the city council must consider the proposal. When residents of College Station presented their petition to the City Council, the red light camera ordinance was repealed via unanimous vote.
    The problem, however, is that not all cities have a clear path to repealing certain laws. Hypothetically, if Austin voters ever wanted to repeal a red light camera ordinance, the Austin City Charter requires a “a petition signed by qualified voters of the city equal in number to the number of signatures required by state law to initiate an amendment to [its] Charter.” State law, under Article 11 of the Texas Constitution, would require a majority vote of all qualified voters in the city to propose such a change, a much higher burden than the process in College Station.

    This recommendation would provide all counties and municipalities in Texas a defined path to petition for repeal of red light camera ordinances. The bill should provide a clear method to present the issue to voters: a petition signed at least ten percent of the number participating in the most recent presidential or gubernatorial election, whichever is more recent. This recommendation respects local governance, while at the same time empowering residents to act on an important issue

    5
    Replies

    I suggest making the delay between Turning Red and the other direction Turning Green LONGER. That is how to save lives versus a ‘red-light-camera’. 3 fatal car collisions at an intersection increases delay by 100% (or some such). Red Light camera’s seem to me a revenue thing sold to the public by advertising safety. I don’t care if people ‘drift’ through stop signs looking both ways before proceeding. I do care about people not even slowing down. Find a way to fine those folks and I’m OK with automation. Red Light cameras seem to me to be only a revenue thing, not a safety thing.

    I suggest following the Republican Party of Texas’ platform and join them and the voters of Texas in calling for an outright ban on the dangerous and unconstitutional cameras. Sitting back and doing nothing doesn’t help us.

    They shouldn’t even be allowed to be installed in the first place. Red light cameras are strictly a revenue opportunity, as well as not being legally enforceable due to the fact that they only record the vehicle tag with no way to prove who was actually behind the wheel.

    I run a business in Crockett,Texas. I loaned a car to a customer. They went to Lufkin and got a ticket. City of Lufkin informed me that they don’t have to follow state laws set by legislation or even The Construction/ Bill of Rights in this matter. If city’s don’t have to follow state and constructional law then why can they use state legislation to enforce their ordinances. Governor Abbott what can / will you do in this matter?

    Red light cameras are ridiculous. Although its comical to watch everyone speed up and slow down quickly to avoid getting ticketed, these cameras should not be installed. Its more unneccesary surveillance by the government. We already have police officers everywhere watching us, I think the red light surveillance is overkill. And people dont need other people watching them 24/7 to operate; we operate just fine without surveillance. I think what the original poster suggested is a fair idea. Please make it easier for us to get these cameras removed.

Be sure to read the Forum Rules.