Home Securing Texans Criminal Justice Overcriminalization

Overcriminalization

This topic contains 4 replies, has 5 voices, and was last updated by  Mitch Holt 10 years, 5 months ago.

  • Overcriminalization

    Started by Will Franklin

    Winston Churchill is often credited with the observation, “If you have ten thousand regulations, you destroy all respect for the law.” The same goes for actual criminal penalties– felonies, even, with serious prison time– for things like expired occupational licensing, harvesting oysters the wrong way, or selling raw milk.

    Texas can be tough on crime and put actual criminals away without overcriminalizing harmless day-to-day activity. For people to respect the laws, they have to understand them, and there simply can’t be so many layers upon layers of confusing, sporadically-enforced laws. Right now, Texas has something like 1,700 individual statutory criminal offenses, many of which are duplicative, contradictory, vague, antiquated, or just more appropriately applied to civil law (small fines, etc., rather than possible prison time). Every legislative session, hundreds more are proposed, many dozens are passed, but thankfully we’ve had a Governor in Rick Perry who has vetoed a lot of them over the years.

    The other good news is that Texas has already improved in this regard, and we aren’t usually one of those states in which you hear about little kids being detained by police for drawing weapons with their crayons. And we’re not New York, which apparently just spent a year in an expensive sting operation against fake Yelp reviews. We seem to use more common sense in Texas than many states, which is good.

    But if we want to be a free people, living in a free society, we have to be vigilant to treat real criminals like criminals, while using caution to lump anything and everything we might not like into the criminal justice system. I’d like to see the Texas law code scrubbed and simplified. I’d like to see many criminal offenses rolled back. And in the meantime, our law enforcement professionals will have more time and other resources to catch the actual bad guys, and our justice system will be more streamlined and efficient, allowing for serious threats to be neutralized more effectively.

    4
    Replies

    Great post, Will, but I would add that every law enforcement officer should have to take a course(s) on the Constitution with testing at course’s end for proficiency. Perhaps this should be applied to elected officials in every capacity as well, as it seems many seem to know nothing of it.

    I would offer that a board of non-lawyers and non-judges, and no politicians be elected by each district to meet in a neutral location, Let these ordinary folks elect a moderator and set committees on a select set of laws. People without any monetary, or political intent can get together and sort out the trivial from the important without regard to constituents.

    I’ve always wanted an non-political oversight who can ask the Speaker of both Houses a bill is not brought forward and the justification for some very wasteful time spent on trivial matters.

    Will, you wrote “I’d like to see the Texas law code scrubbed and simplified.” Provide examples if you would

    I agree with minimizing texas laws, and let’s write them in plain English, on a seventh grade level , so that even a lawyer can understand the clearly expressed intentions of that law. Let’s eradicate every statute in contradiction to the US Constitution. Let it be known to every judge, cop, representative,
    senator, and all other public officials, that they work for us, we the people, and they are always on sort of a probationary period. They can be replaced at we the peoples will and pleasure.
    I believe all public servants should be required to pass an extensive exam on the Constitution once every year in order to keep their job.

Be sure to read the Forum Rules.